|
Almost all men have the desire to challenge themselves and
society. For most people, this desire is never acted upon, either because it
would be too hard to do so or because responsibilities to family, careers and
social pressures weigh too heavily upon them. But, those individuals who do act
on this desire are the ones most likely to find truth. Sean Penn’s new film,
“Into the Wild,” introduces us to such an individual.
Based on the 1996 book by Jon Krakauer, “Into the Wild”
tells the true story of Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsch), an upper middle class
graduate of Emory College, who, upon graduation, gives away his life savings
and burns his pocket cash, because money “makes you cautious,” and McCandless
wants to unburden himself of comfort and security in order to experience life
in the raw.
After losing his car in a flash flood (the second scariest
part of the movie, the first being when he gets the shit beaten out of him by a
railroad cop), McCandless sets out on foot. In the journey across America, he
depends on free rides, book-fueled inspiration and an industrious good charm.
He passes through landscapes that suggest infinite freedom and the
possibilities inherent in vast open spaces. Along the way, he also meets a number
of characters with whom he bounces wisdom back and forth like a tennis ball.
Despite some useful nuggets McCandless picks up from these characters, he
always comes out on top in terms of insightfulness. Game, set, match.
To fund his cross bound journey of enlightenment, McCandless
takes several jobs, one of which is on a corn farm in Middle America. While
there, he finds a kindred spirit in the farm manager, played by Vince Vaughn.
Although their friendship becomes a constant theme throughout the film, it’s
never really explained how or why the two became such good pals, and Vaughn’s
typically comedic alpha-male character is a bit out of whack for the movie.
Somewhere in between hitchhiking, train hopping and floating
on a raft down the Colorado River, McCandless gets it into his head to go to
Alaska. He wants to live in the wild, “away from society.” With fierce
determination, McCandless begins planning for his “Great Alaskan Adventure,”
but as the departure date approaches, his steadfast veneer is pierced by the
idea that an enriching life includes living among loved ones. Despite these
pinholes of hesitation, he sets out northward.
Living among loved ones was a difficult notion for
McCandless. Part of the reason he struck out was to get away from the superficial
existence of living in his parents’ world of material concerns, thread together
with underlying tensions that would bubble up to the surface in bursts of
domestic violence. Throughout the film, McCandless never once notifies his
parents of where he is or that he’s OK. His callous negligence destroys the
fragile glass around his parents’ sugarcoated world.
After being dropped off in the Alaskan wilderness,
McCandless finds an empty bus, which he makes his home for more than a year. At
first, McCandless welcomes the isolation and thrives in the challenges of
survival, but loneliness soon creeps in, and the more he thinks about his life,
the more he realizes that “happiness is only real when shared.” Based on this
conclusion, he packs his backpack to make the return journey to a semi-normal
life among loved ones. But his passage is blocked and his journey home is
halted.
“Into the Wild” ends in tragedy, but offers inspiration.
Despite the stifling social pressure to conform to a life unchallenged, McCandless
busts out and fulfills the all-American desire to hit the open road. The fact
that he ultimately fails has caused many readers of Krakauer’s book to question
the merits of McCandless’ adventure. Penn’s film lets viewers decide whether
McCandless’ journey was brave or foolish, but his determination to seek out
meaning is noble in itself.
|