|
citizens want more mediation and civility in family court proceedings
Steve Vogl, a mediator based in Exeter, wants to see New Hampshire’s
court system become less intimidating and more accommodating.
“You have to have a conversation with us, you have to listen,” he said.
“Bring the judge or master down from the bench, literally.”
Vogl was one of six people who turned out at Portsmouth City Hall on
Monday for a public listening session for the New Hampshire Citizen’s
Commission on the State Courts. It was the independent commission’s
fourth public session since its establishment in April 2005 to commence
a “top-to-bottom review” of the state court system, according to
co-chairperson Will Abbott. Only five members of the commission,
including Abbott, were present. Co-chairperson Kathy Eneguess presided
over the meeting.
During the session, Vogl, who described himself as a “child of divorced
parents and a divorced parent myself,” wants the state’s family courts
to drop the “adversarial” system in which divorce and custody cases are
conducted and adopt an approach that relies more on mediation. The
current system “causes so much animosity and pain,” he said, and is
made even worse by lawyers and court appointed officers who interfere
with the family.
“We don’t have to do it this way and we have to have a new vision,” he said.
In a phone interview before the session, Abbott said much of the public comments so far have centered on family court issues.
“This is a huge part of the court system’s docket, so it’s not
surprising,” he said. “Family issues tend to be close to the heart and
close to the head, and if something doesn’t go the way you want it to
go, it tends to be pretty distressing.”
The commission was created last year by state Supreme Court Chief
Justice David Broderick to “assess how justice is delivered” from the
perspective of average citizens. The 105 members are comprised of
lawyers, judges, court employees and private citizens. Abbott, the
executive director of the Mount Washington Observatory, said about
one-third of the members are involved in some way with the legal system
because “for those of us who know very little about law profession or
way courts operate, it’s helpful to have judges or attorneys
participate in this.” So far, the commission has held public listening
sessions in Manchester, Nashua and Concord. Transcripts of the meetings
will be made available at www.nhcitcourts.org.
Portsmouth Mayor Evelyn Sirrell was also on hand for the meeting.
During her testimony, Sirrell questioned why the state does not have a
“good-time” policy for prisoners, which would reduce the amount of time
served for prisoners with good behavior. Sirrell’s son, Christopher, is
an inmate at the state prison in Concord. Sirrell also addressed how
high legal costs often force people to represent themselves. During her
son’s case, Sirrell said she had spent much of her savings and
retirement fund in order to afford representation for her son. When she
could no longer afford to pay for an attorney, “…my son was defending
himself in his green prison jumpsuit,” she said. “The system, as far as
I’m concerned, is not working.”
This has also been a recurring issue, according to Abbott. Over
two-thirds of the cases that come before state courts have at least one
of the litigants defending themselves, he said.
“That creates problems,” he said. “(It’s) not that everybody absolutely
has to have an attorney, but very few laypeople understand procedures,”
he said. Legal costs are “clearly an issue … and there’s no easy remedy
for that.”
During his testimony, Michael Brewster, a former “stay-at-home dad” who
says his child was taken away from him after his wife divorced him,
said the state has “no accountability.”
“They can bring down a family and say anything they wish,” he said.
“How many people must this state abuse constantly and there’s nobody to
bring these complaints to?”
Much of the afternoon’s testimony came from Michael Geanoulis, a New
Castle resident and chairman of the state chapter of the National
Congress for Fathers and Children. Geanoulis told commission members
“there’s a lack of respect for fatherhood in this country.” He
recommends that judges should be educated on “the importance of the
family structure” and the court system in general should be aware that
fathers are just as important as mothers in a child’s development.
The way child support is collected and disbursed also needs to be
reformed, according to Geanoulis. “Mind-boggling” amounts of money are
spent to collect child support, he said, usually from fathers who are
“average or below-average wage earners.”
The commission will hold public listening sessions through December of
this year and will issue a final report in May 2006. Already, though,
there are some efforts being made to make the courts “more user
friendly,” Abbott said. In Rockingham and Grafton counties, family
court cases have been tried in a separate court system, apart from
criminal and civil cases, as part of a pilot program to streamline
proceedings. According to Abbott, the state plans to have a separate
family court operating in each county.
Public response to the commission has been “less than what we expected
… (but) it seems to be growing,” Abbott said. The first two meetings
attracted between 10 and 15 people he said, and a third meeting in
Concord drew about 18 people. Though the low turnouts don’t necessarily
mean everyone’s happy with the state of the court system, “you have to
somewhat assume they’re relatively satisfied with the way things are
going,” Abbott said.
|